Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 901 - 920 of 21,678
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2019, 5:23 am by ASAD KHAN
Sarmiento and Sharpston view Zambrano (C-34/09, EU:C:2011:124), which caused a stir because of the substance of rights test, as a “high-water mark” in the CJEU’s jurisprudence. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 12:52 am
It must be for the applicant to state clearly the type of monopoly for which he contends. [read post]
22 May 2009, 6:12 am
The parties should also consider the guidance given by Arden LJ in Horvath v Secretary of State for Environment [2007] EWCA Civ 620 at [80]. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:19 am
The problem, stated at its most general, is simple. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm by Rachael Hanna
Mark Martins, authorizing Khan to use the laptop for “rehabilitative purposes. [read post]
7 May 2008, 12:37 pm
The season ended with a particularly interesting argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 6:21 am by Riana Harvey
The GC also stated that Tulliallan could rely on the protection of earlier mark’s reputation for all of the services covered by earlier marks in Class 35. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm by Jim Chen
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by David Super
“I think we are on the cusp of a supermajority moment,” Convention of States Action President Mark Meckler said during a session for legislators at ALEC's December 2021 national policy convention. [read post]