Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 901 - 920
of 9,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 8:30 am
United States). [read post]
12 May 2023, 2:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of CADG v Ryba [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:09 am
VIP PRODUCTS LLC (Opinion, United States Supreme Court) Agencies issue fina... [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 9:38 pm
Today, in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Somraj Singh, Opposition No. 91175272 (December 10, 2008) [not precedential].Opposer established the fame of its mark via testimony that it has 4,315 office in the United States, 80,00 sales associates, and a 16% market share. [read post]
6 Mar 2016, 1:37 pm
Inc. owns a four-unit apartment house in Salisbury. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 3:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:11 am
United States as good law? [read post]
24 Dec 2007, 6:17 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:13 am
The Gutierrez family continues with the tradition introducing La Michoacana to the United States. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:14 pm
(I will be joined by the trial counsel Tor Ekeland and his colleagues Nace Naumoski and Mark Jaffe, together with Marcia Hofmann and Hanni Fakhoury of EFF.) [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:28 am
Generally, plaintiff's Heathcote's choice of forum would be given deference, but in false marking cases the United States is the real party in interest. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 5:20 am
United States, the Court held that a provision of the federal bank fraud statute which makes it a crime to “knowingly execut[e] a scheme . . . to obtain” property owned by, or under the custody of, a bank “by means of false or fraudulent pretenses” does not require the government to prove that a defendant intended to defraud a financial institution. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:38 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
On April 18, 2014, counsel for Jennifer Dize, the personal representative of the Estate of William Smith Dize, filed a interesting and very well-written petition for certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 2:44 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 11:34 am
Baum v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 1:37 pm
But when it comes to free speech on the Internet here in the United States, Section 230 is as vital as the First Amendment. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:18 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has affirmed, on summary judgment, the TTAB's precedential decision in RxD Media, LLC v. [read post]
