Search for: "Martin v. United States"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Mar 2014, 10:26 am
” Rutherford Institute: A leading advocate of civil liberties and human rights in the United States for more than 30 years, the Rutherford Institute argues that the bulk phone-records program amounts to nothing more than a “modern-day general warrant” — precisely the kind of unrestrained government search with which the Founders were most concerned when drafting the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 8:55 am
United States v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:33 pm
Lockheed Martin Corp., p.197 # Michael Lyons, Reasonably Precise Specifications and the Military Contractor Defense—The Eleventh Circuit Misapplies the Boyle Test: Brinson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 1:50 am
Raymond v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
His lecture will be preceded by an introductory talk and tour of the church by John Martin. [read post]
31 May 2019, 7:37 am
Raphael Lemkin, a Polish Jewish international law jurist who lived and taught law in the United States at the end of his life, is famous for coining the word “genocide”. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 6:15 am
Barron v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 12:05 pm
Sweeney v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 12:20 pm
And Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 7:22 am
Ninth Circuit Upholds Issuance of Warrant Based on E-mail Recipient List — United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Bloomfield, Robert Gorgia, and John Earl Martin, Sr.Administrative Proceeding File No. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:56 am
Kentucky and INS v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 12:52 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 6:31 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University 239 Lewis Katz Building University Park, PA 16802 For book: "Imaginaries of Crisis and Fear: Constitutional and International Law Perspectives" (Martin Belov, ed.) [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
United States, et al. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 2:54 am
United States and concludes that “[t]he smart money is that the Court will take Justice Scalia’s suggestion and simply strike the residual clause, thereby leaving only the listed offenses. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
