Search for: "Matter of Anthony R." Results 901 - 920 of 1,143
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2012, 5:50 pm by Ted Folkman
Civil Disobedience Civil disobedience is largely a matter of conscience, and I think it’s admirable when people prompted by sincere conscientious beliefs and willing to accept the consequences engage in civil disobedience. [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 7:56 pm by Jarod Bona
” The opinion says a lot, but this core fact—competitors regulating competitors—is what ultimately matters. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 1:55 pm by Ilya Somin
The fact that it was done by the judiciary rather than by legislature or executive should not matter. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:41 pm by David Lat
As we have repeatedly stressed throughout our coverage of this matter, please keep in mind that the allegations against McDaniel are just that — allegations. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 4:50 am by Robin Shea
(Kennedy also wrote a separate dissent emphasizing that he was not opposed to pregnancy accommodations as a matter of principle.) [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:56 am by Lauren Valkenaar (US)
Plaintiff’s inequitable conduct is the basis for a valid defense only if it relates in some way to the subject matter of litigation. [read post]
3 Dec 2008, 5:19 pm
Souter, doing so fervently, and Justices Anthony M. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am by David Lat
(In other words, maybe you might not like the Act as a policy matter — but if that’s your problem, you should defeat it through the political process.) [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:46 am
” New York Public Personnel Law [Feed] Provides summary and commentary on selected court and administrative decisions and related matters affecting public employers and employees in New York State. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
In this case, Lord Reid's observations in R v Knuller (Publishing, Printing and Promotions) Ltd [1973] AC 435 were pertinent: I have said more than once in recent cases that our change of practice in no longer regarding previous decisions of this House as absolutely binding does not mean that whenever we think that a previous decision was wrong we should reverse it. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
Well done, BCA can favor major regulations, such as phasing out CFCs, reducing particulate matter air pollution, and sound climate policy.[12] The challenge is to get beyond “tunnel vision,”[13] and to counteract “disregard” of impacts and affected subgroups.[14]Assessing all important impacts helps overcome these cognitive limitations, and the “omitted voice” of underrepresented subgroups, by pressing policy makers to think more holistically and… [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
The answer matters a great deal, for the response must be at the heart of anything we might call criminal justice reform. *** There’s no question what the response would have been for most of the past 45 years: Start at the bottom and work your way up. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:14 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/4rapaua (Anthony Davis) Counsel at Leading Social Sites Describe Crush of User Content Takedown Requests - http://tinyurl.com/4k5bqjv (Joyce Cutler) Court Sanctions Plaintiff and Counsel for Misuse of Discovery Process, Including Failing to Reveal That Relevant Cell Phones were Discarded - http://tinyurl.com/4nrffp7 (K&L Gates) Court to Rule in Case of Imprisoned U.K. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:59 pm
  “That is a matter yet to be determined. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
United States Based on statements he posted on Facebook directed at, among others, his ex-wife, federal law enforcement officials, and school children, Anthony Elonis was convicted of violating federal criminal statutes that prohibit the interstate transmission of communications containing threats to injure other persons. [read post]
25 Nov 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
None of this means that Trump or even Babbitt are without fault in this matter. [read post]