Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2014, 2:02 am
That's why I needed to think about it a little more after my initial reaction to Google's cert petition. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 2:50 pm
What mattered was that Sun Microsystems, when it created Java, could have designed those APIs differently. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Though the state supreme court held that, as a matter of state law, the trial court erred in conducting the hearing ex parte, it determined that the errors were harmless. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 5:28 pm
This conclusion followed the following statement of law: Further, as a matter of substantive patent law, all co-owners must ordinarily consent to join as plaintiffs in an infringement suit.9 Consequently, “one co-owner has the right to impede the other co-owner’s ability to sue infringers by refusing to voluntarily join in such a suit. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 3:13 pm
I don't think this one needs to be heard at all: U.S. copyright law is perfectly clear (there is a low threshold for copyrightability and in this case, enormous creativity was conceded by Google's own counsel and witnesses), and Ninth Circuit law is clear as long as one interprets it reasonably. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 9:20 am
The parties briefed the matter on the merits, but Public Citizen took a different tactic, seeking to avoid the question presented, on which the class-action plaintiffs seemed to have little chance of prevailing. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 8:56 am
That would happen if the Sixth Circuit reverses the district court decisions striking down anti-SSM laws in Ohio, Kentucky, Michigan, and Tennessee. [read post]
8 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Supreme Court Denies Cert for Celebrity Cruise Line Workers. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 4:35 pm
Consider, for example, what the cert. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 1:16 pm
It must be that the substantive constitutional law has changed enough that the matter is at least open to question in the lower courts. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 12:56 pm
Same-Sex Marriage After the Court’s Denial of Cert. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:59 am
Marriage is a question for the States.... [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 10:02 am
The state’s Brief in Opposition had argued that it would be better to review a different case in which the exclusionary rule issue was also part of the case, a position the Justices presumably weighed before granting cert on just the rights question. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 12:58 pm
IndyMac, a case that questioned whether filing of [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 10:23 am
Pacifica Foundation, 438 U.S. 726, 747 (1978), both the First Amendment and Section 326 of the Act forbid us from censoring subject matter and opinions relating to religious beliefs, race or national background, regardless of how offensive they may be, e.g., Thaddeus L. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 3:15 am
As I had noted on this blog (here), one of the important securities law cases on the U.S. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 7:22 pm
Tonight in a public question-and-answer session at the University of Minnesota Law School, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said the Court did not need to rush into the question of same-sex marriage because the lower courts had not yet disagreed on the issue. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
Cie Montréal Trust[30], la Cour, en obiter[31], s’est déjà penchée sur la question. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
Consider this question further as you read the materials that follow.3. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:00 pm
If, in fact, the Court simply decided that this was not the right case for resolving the Article III question, it could grant cert. on the same question in a future case. [read post]
