Search for: "Matter of Election Reform Amendment"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,603
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Reform groups support the effort, saying it would make it easier for a more diverse collection of people to seek public office. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
For President Trump’s role in ceaselessly undermining faith in the election results and seeming to incite violence, some suggest invoking the 25th Amendment which would facilitate removal of the President. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
If these super-important matters can admit of a “mix and match” approach (Justice Liu’s term) that makes use of both legislative vetting and popular approval, why wouldn’t the same be true for other, less important, matters? [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:36 am
Garland’s decision to place the probe under supervision of a special counsel ratchets up the legal stakes for Biden, who has stressed he takes the matter seriously while saying he was surprised to learn about the existence of the documents. [read post]
6 Feb 2021, 4:30 am
In varying ways, the contributors ask what fairness means for an historian like me, writing about a topic like this, at a time like this, when large percentages of Americans persist without a shred of reliable evidence in believing the election to be stolen. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 7:56 am
In recent years, U.S. companies have become increasingly receptive to this governance reform. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm
Criticism of the shadow docket has been made in election disputes, for the “SB 8″ Texas abortion ban, in immigration matters, and in COVID regulation proceedings.The leaked draft opinion in Dobbs, and other leaks about that draft, offer insights into power struggles within the Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 6:33 am
Others question the power and legality of city employees so actively involved in electing council members, the people who will decide matters such as their wages and department budgets. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
District Court for the District of Columbia found Section 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act unconstitutionally infringes on candidates’ free speech rights. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
The loophole links back to the 2014 “Cromnibus” and an amendment to the Federal Election Campaign Act that allows parties to draw funds from “special purpose accounts,” according to the complaint. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 4:23 pm
Weekly D2488bCondominiums -- Where condominium association filed petition for temporary injunction against unit owner, and court denied petition and returned matter to arbitration, award of attorney's fees to unit owner as prevailing party was premature -- Award of fees was error because the non-final order denying the petition for injunction did not end the litigation between the parties, and no final determination on the merits had been madeReported at 34 Fla. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
The court directed the parties to file written submissions on 8 November 2022 and reply submissions on 10 November 2022 to allow the Judge to decide the matter on paper. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 6:20 am
The bill includes some significant changes to 702, though the reforms are substantially more modest than those sought by privacy advocates. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 5:39 am
It would as a practical matter strip President Trump’s judicial appointees (and, in the stronger form, those of President George W. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm
We urge the Biden administration to make amends to those who were excluded from entry to the country because of the ban. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 11:57 pm
The bill is expected to mirror Bill C-32, the previous copyright package that died with the election in the spring. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:18 am
It was subsequently amended to create a second window when the victim reaches the age of majority. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
What any such reform must keep within its sights is that Convention rights – any rights – are not defined independently of any variable. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
All nine justices seemed to acknowledge the challenge and importance of defining when government employees are acting in an official capacity online, and therefore bound by First Amendment restrictions on censorship; and when they are acting as private citizens, with their own individual free speech rights. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
Stamer often has worked, extensively on these and other workforce and performance related matters. [read post]
