Search for: "Mike Rounds"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,436
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post creates a “short list” of potential nominees to the Court should a Republican win the 2012 presidential election. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 8:13 pm
Coming to you much later than normal, we draw on 162 posts hitting the LexBlog Network to round up ten of today's best. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
Finally, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post examines the questions of “corporate personhood” raised by Kiobel v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 9:15 am
At Balkinization Ken Kersh responds to Adam Liptak’s article in the New York Times (included in yesterday’s round-up), which compares what is fast becoming a blockbuster Term this year to past noteworthy Terms. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 3:21 am
If the impregnation of a teen client wasn't enough to make Jerry Sandusky think twice about his choice of lawyer, this might: After Sandusky waived his right to a pretrial hearing yesterday, Joe Amendola told reporters that anybody who believes Mike McQueary witnessed his client raping a boy and university administrators failed to act "should call 1-800-REALITY. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 6:26 am
To round out an eventful day, the Court also released its second opinion of the Term in an argued case. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 12:46 pm
Mitt Romney was heading into town on December 14th for his own rousing round of four fundraisers. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:31 am
In the context of a discussion with his young daughter about the Affordable Care Act and a hypothetical law requiring everyone to eat broccoli, Mike Dorf of Dorf on Law discusses the historical distinction between prohibitions and affirmative obligations. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
Joan Biskupic of the USA Today, Robert Barnes of the Washington Post, and David Savage of the Chicago Tribune all covered the oral argument in Williams; additional coverage comes from Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post – who reports that Justice Kennedy “seemed to abandon his concerns” about the Court’s current Confrontation Clause jurisprudence – and Jonathan Arogeti at ACSblog. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 2:56 am
Round 2: John Henry vs. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 1:00 pm
David Savage of the Los Angeles Times and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also covered the oral argument. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 9:38 pm
Posted by Mike Dorf My latest Verdict column is co-authored with Duke Law & Poli Sci Professor Neil Siegel. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 6:18 am
Employees like Diane, Mike and Luis, who I met when we traveled to the Eloy facility, now make the 140 mile round trip daily in order to continue working for the company they love. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am
Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post and Stacey Samuel of CNN report that an organization called the Nativity Project brought a nativity scene to the steps of the Court yesterday. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:01 am
The grievances ask the State Bar of Texas to discipline Morton’s trial prosecutors - Ken Anderson, now a district judge in Georgetown, and Mike Davis, now a Round Rock lawyer — and current District Attorney John Bradley. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 6:51 am
Greg Stohr of Bloomberg has coverage of the oral argument and reports that the Justices seemed skeptical that the homebuyer would have standing to sue; Reuters, the Cleveland Plain Dealer, and Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post also have coverage. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks disputes what he describes as the “most persistent myth about Justice Thomas – that he is Justice Antonin Scalia’s puppet. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 3:18 pm
At the Regal Beagle, Sam buys the first round and Alice buys the second round of Fruit-Tinis. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am
” Finally, while Mike Norman insists in the Kansas City Star that Congress is not prepared to act swiftly in response to the Court’s ultimate decision, Andrew McCarthy argues in the National Review Online that “[w]hat Obamacare needs now, what it has always needed, and what it will continue to need after the Supremes issue their ruling next year is a political repeal. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:25 am
By Mike Dorf My latest Verdict column addresses the question why amicus curiae briefs by scholars speaking on their own behalf have proliferated in recent years. [read post]
