Search for: "Miller v. State of California" Results 901 - 920 of 1,365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 8:12 am by Rick Hills
We had horse doctors’ doses of that sort of “rights” jurisprudence from the pre-Miller v California days, when the SCOTUS used to apply First Amendment obscenity doctrine by watching porno flicks in chambers. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:03 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s unconstitutional, says a Ninth Circuit panel in yesterday’s Williams v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 12:21 pm by LundgrenJohnson
Supreme Court has defined a test for obscenity in Miller v. [read post]
15 Nov 2007, 10:15 pm
Ted Frank has a good round up of analysis on the potential problems spots at Point of Law; And Howard Erichson reports on a plaintiffs-only conference to discuss the settlement;From the miscellaneous category: New York State practitioners should take note of a reversal in Raffellini v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am by John Elwood
California, 14-5442, involved whether a state court reviewing a Batson v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 5:37 pm by Amy Howe
The hospital came to the Supreme Court last year after a California appeals court allowed the case to go forward. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
California, 14-5442. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Lastly, United States v. [read post]