Search for: "National Service Industries v. Powers"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,731
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2018, 4:00 am
The Right to be Forgotten The right to be forgotten (RTBF) came to prominence following the Court of Justice of the European Union ruling in Google Spain v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 8:18 am
What kind of jurisdiction does Article 8(3) of the InfoSoc Directive, as implemented into the laws of Member States, confer upon national courts? [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:38 am
“Buy American” – Maximizing Domestic Production in Federal Procurements Perhaps most impactful to the pharmaceutical and medical device industries, the Order imposes a new “Buy American” requirement. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
In February the Higher Regional Court Munich (OLG) decided that YouTube and its service cannot be called to account for any user generated copyright infringements. [read post]
16 May 2017, 3:45 am
” In Howell v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 9:22 am
A House-Senate conference committee has reported out the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act providing for a sweeping overhaul of the regulation of US financial services and markets. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 5:18 pm
In Everport Terminal Services Inc v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:02 am
Hassel v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The Guardian, National, BBC and Independent have more information. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
And nearly all of those products are made by large multi-national corporations, who most certainly could prosper, by dent of market power, without patent protection. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 12:47 pm
Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan, the Court will be deciding an issue that has divided federal appeals courts six to two on an issue under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
Like the organization of political power, which is understood to be necessarily centered on the state as the sole embodiment of collective power, the organization of economic power is understood to be centered on the state apparatus as the sole embodiment of economic power. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
In WhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:20 pm
Owusu v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
The same blog has also published an article on the recent decisions in The Queen on the application of Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2022] EWHC 770 QB and Her Majesty’s Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corporation [2022] EWHC 826 (QB), on the topic of closed judgments. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
' Court of Appeal rules... - Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
– Scopelight Ltd & Ors v Chief Constable of Northumbria and Federation Against Copyright Theft concerning police powers to retain seized property once decision not prosecute has been made (1709 Copyright Blog) Warner Bros says Harry Potter theme dinner infringes copyright (TorrentFreak) United States US General Did you know... section 337 settlement agreements must be approved by the ITC? [read post]
25 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
The lawyers (including benchers) representing such ABS investors will make millions of dollars in legal fees from representing them in individual negotiations with hundreds of client-starved law firms—like shooting fish in a barrel; the “fish” having no bargaining power. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 2:24 am
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Bull v Desporte, heard 25 to 28 March 2019 (Julian Knowles J) Sadik v Sadik, heard 2 April 2019 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
