Search for: "New v. New"
Results 901 - 920
of 185,936
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2012, 12:48 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
City of New York (Contract) Plaza v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:16 pm
Last week, in Walker v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:00 am
A few years ago I wrote an amicus brief in Norton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
One recent case, entitled Ricci v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm
One recent case, entitled Ricci v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 5:48 am
The lawsuit, which also involved some breach of copyright, argued that Barclays had a form of property right in the “hot news” worthy of protection from The Fly; and the judge, after a discussion of the classic U.S. case of INS v. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 1:37 pm
New York Times v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 9:54 pm
In Mendoza v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 6:31 am
And time for the weekly round up of interesting posts from my fellow New York legal bloggers: Indignant Indigent: Oh (discusses recent NY Court of Appeals decision, People v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 5:14 am
A New Mexico court has upheld state-levied fines against a photographer who refused a job taking pictures at a same-sex wedding (Elane Photography v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 5:29 pm
ABSTRACT: When it was decided in 2002, Ring v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:52 pm
An opinion from New York’s highest court last month begins as follows: Petitioner, a New York City police officer, retired in 2004 and was awarded accident disability benefits. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 11:54 am
(Fabiano v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:37 am
In Safe Step Walk in Tub Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 10:40 am
Abstract below: At the time Roe v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:00 pm
Rohn Padmore, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:42 am
The New York Times has more on the Wyeth decision in this article. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:53 am
Regina v Khan Regina v Lockett; Regina v Carrington Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Confiscation orders made under old regulations in tobacco-smuggling cases had to be quashed because the prosecuting authority had overlooked the fact that new regulations had narrowed the categories of persons liable to pay excise duty. [read post]
