Search for: "PEOPLE v. JOHNSON" Results 901 - 920 of 2,761
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Johnson further stated that the seizure remains lawful only “so long as unrelated inquires do not measurably extend the duration of the stop. [read post]
10 May 2018, 9:49 am by Richard Hunt
Although no defense may be the best defense in some cases, a half defense is probably a mistake, as illustrated by Johnson v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
But it seems to me that people are overlooking the obvious answer: While many people were hoping and praying during the bleak dull days of October Term 2016 that the Supreme Court would finally get some interesting cases, nobody thought to wish that the court would ever actually decide them. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:00 am by Eliot Kim
On April 17, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in Sessions v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am by John Elwood
Just identifying all those relists on the court’s docket, and then figuring out the legal issues involved, was a big job for people who really do have other responsibilities. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:30 am by INFORRM
  After being told that Mr Johnson had had a tip-off that police were investigating the singer, Mr Smith wrote: “Congratulations and jubilations, I want the world to know I’m happy as can be. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Akhil Amar
" He had been tipped off about the Supreme Court’s decision in the Dred Scott v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 3:43 am by INFORRM
Mr Johnson said he told BBC editors that it was “possible” that the people from South Yorkshire Police whom he met had felt “pressured” to co-operate with him. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 2:49 am by INFORRM
The fifth day of the trial of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC saw the conclusion of the claimant’s case and the first witness for the BBC. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am by Edith Roberts
Kevin Johnson analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 10:46 am by Kent Scheidegger
  Here is the essence of today's holding:Three Terms ago, in Johnson v. [read post]