Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US" Results 901 - 920 of 4,554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2021, 4:45 pm by INFORRM
This is an academic exercise, acknowledging that a trial on racist defamation would likely fail on the precision of the imputations, which are often deliberately vague. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 12:58 pm by lennyesq
The precise articulation of the standard aside, this much is clear: context is crucial in determining the line between protected advocacy and prohibited incitement. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Eric Goldman
The court rejects a similar analysis: “Notably missing from these arguments, however, is citation to authority approving the use of Facebook or Twitter’s community standards in analyzing whether the First Amendment is infringed. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 6:31 am by Rui Dias
It was also discussed in the judgments C-507/17, Google v CNIL; and Case C-136/17 that a data subject should have a “right to be forgotten” where the retention of such data infringes the Directive 95/46 and the GDPR. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
Congress intended to depart from that era by defining the scope of foreign sovereign immunity through the FSIA, standardizing sovereign immunity determinations, and leaving those determinations to the courts. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 5:01 am by Tia Sewell
” Trump’s claim earned a response from the news body, which subsequently ran an article titled “Trump’s VOA Criticism Shows US-Funded News Doesn’t Mean US-Approved. [read post]