Search for: "PREFERRED CARE, INC." Results 901 - 920 of 1,735
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am by Andrew Hamm
The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc., and Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
  The vendor promises to obtain a list of physicians and take care of all the details. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 8:05 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Well known for her extensive work with health care, insurance and other highly regulated entities on corporate compliance, internal controls and risk management, her clients range from highly regulated entities like employers, contractors and their employee benefit plans, their sponsors, management, administrators, insurers, fiduciaries and advisors, technology and data service providers, health care, managed care and insurance, financial services, government contractors… [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Hopefully, the “preferred wording” suggested within this article is already incorporated within the exclusionary language contained in your cyber and privacy policy. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:56 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Employers that sponsor group health plans that violated certain health care reform mandates for claims and appeals imposed by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will face a duty to pay an excise tax of $100 per violation per day under the expanded Form 8928 filing requirements made applicable to employers providing health plan coverage after 2013 under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), as well undermine the enforceability of claims and appeals decisions… [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am by Jon Gelman
The Application of the Fair Labor Standards Act’s “Suffer or Permit” Standard in the Identification of Employees Who Are Misclassified as Independent Contractors.Sounding very much like a workers' compensation standardized employment status test, the US Department of Labor has added its interpretation this developing area of the law. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 2:14 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Elizabeth’s Medical Center (SEMC) includes a clear message to health plans, health care providers, health care clearinghouses (Covered Entities) and their business associates to adequately secure and ensure that workforce members properly use internet applications and other systems used to share, access or maintain personally identifiable health information considered protected health information (PHI) in accordance with HIPAA. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 10:44 am by Sarah Andropoulos
No information contained in this post should be construed as legal advice from Justia Inc. or the individual author, nor is it intended to be a substitute for legal counsel on any subject matter. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Well known for her extensive work with health care, insurance and other highly regulated entities on corporate compliance, internal controls and risk management, her clients range from highly regulated entities like employers, contractors and their employee benefit plans, their sponsors, management, administrators, insurers, fiduciaries and advisors, technology and data service providers, health care, managed care and insurance, financial services, government… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 10:53 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Burwell decision as a green light for its full implementation and enforcement of the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act (ACA), U.S. businesses should brace for both increases in health benefit costs and liabilities over the next year as well as take prompt action to identify and mitigate potential excise tax and other exposures from any unaddressed compliance deficiencies in their 2014 or 2015 health plans as soon as possible and no later than the due date for… [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:08 pm by John Elwood
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
When working to adopt updated policies and practices for deciding whether to treat two individuals, regardless of their sex, as married for employment or employee benefit purposes, employers, employee benefit plans, and their management, fiduciaries, service providers and advisors also need to use care to manage potential discrimination risks that might arise from the adoption of policies that by the terms or in operation treat same sex versus opposite sex partners disparately. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:00 pm by John Ehrett
Coventry Health Care of Missouri, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 5:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This narrow interpretation of Section 109 was stretched to the breaking point by the Delaware Supreme Court’s en banc decision in  ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm by John Elwood
Kingdomware Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
But the individual prefers a license plate design to the purely private speech expressed through bumper stickers. [read post]