Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 28,405
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2024, 9:09 am
Discussion Background While the CTA appears to be ministerial or administrative in nature, it is rooted in broader national security initiatives as it was originally passed by the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
That would scarcely have made a dent in the available funds and, in any case, Frankfurter, who joined the Supreme Court in 1939, never got around to it.[7] Many years passed. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
After all, putting aside the ultimate outcome of the case, no one wants a set of opinions that look worse with each passing year the way many of the writings in Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
On February 7, the Supreme Court of Hawai'i decided State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:39 pm
The specter of Dunning School history haunted oral argument in Anderson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
Which brings us to a new piece of legislation passed by the Texas Legislature and signed into law by Governor Abbott, to be effective on March 5, 2024. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
The state Senate passed the bill on January 16, 2024. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:22 am
Supreme Court recently agreed to consider City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Johnson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:07 am
The Health Plan Excess Fee Case Filed Against Johnson and Johnson In Lewandowski v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 1:02 am
On 14 February 2024 there will be a strike out/summary judgment application in the case of Chowdhury-v-Secretary of State for the Home Department KB-2023-003368. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
NetChoice v. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 11:44 am
§ 1-3-3(3) states that an “act of God” refers to “an accident produced by physical causes which are irresistible or inevitable, such as … illness. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 11:12 pm
The motion passed, 8 to 3. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 10:28 pm
The motion was passed unanimously. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
Further, the Court stated that it is an established principle of settled case-law that, as a general rule, the submission of facts and evidence by the parties remains possible after the expiry of the relevant time limits, and the EUIPO is not prohibited from taking account of such facts and evidence (mobile.de v EUIPO, C‑418/16 P).In this case, it was accepted by both parties that Mr Noah had submitted the first evidence of use of the Mark within the time limit set by… [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 5:00 pm
Putin ("President Vladimir V. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
There was a tension in yesterday's oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
