Search for: "People v Baker" Results 901 - 920 of 1,153
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
Ly and of Scott Baker J in Ex p. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
Ly and of Scott Baker J in Ex p. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 4:04 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The cases brought by citizens against compulsory vaccination, and in particular, Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
I expect Student Loans to be the scourge of this Generation; I routinely talk to wonderful people who have gigantic student loans, and have no chance of getting them paid any time during this depression. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:34 am by Dennis Crouch
Duffy was co-counsel in the important Supreme Court case KSR v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
I don’t like it when people steal, the author always feels it especially painfully”. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:02 am by James Bickford
”  And, at the Volokh Conspiracy, Stewart Baker analyzes the December oral argument in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:01 pm by reconstructinglawschool
During the same class as the privilege discussion ,  the professor identified Lochner v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:48 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
So written terms that people intended as a complete and final expression of their bargain on the subject cannot be supplemented or contradicted by evidence of prior agreements or any oral contemporaneous agreements. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]