Search for: "People v Davis" Results 901 - 920 of 2,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
8 Dec 2024, 12:58 am by Frank Cranmer
Madeleine Davis, Church Times: National Safeguarding Team sets out next steps after Makin review. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Jennifer Davis: class consciousness among judges in English law of 19th c. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”)As I have written before, really smart people (including high-level campus leaders) don’t always seem to understand or embrace this crucial distinction between speaking (as is one’s right) and drowning out others who have reserved a place for their own speech. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 4:06 am by SHG
Davis, 454 U.S. 370 (1982) (per curiam) (upholding a forty-year sentence for possession of nine ounces of marijuana with the intent to distribute); Rummel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:47 am by Russ Bensing
 Davis… If at first you don’t succeed. [read post]
10 Oct 2024, 2:05 pm by John Elwood
After last term, which was heavy on separation of powers and “administrative state” issues, many people are watching Consumers’ Research v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Accountability, Inc. v Cuomo, 167 AD3d 1406, 1409 [3d Dept 2018], appeal dismissed 33 NY3d 993 [2019], lv dismissed & denied 34 NY3d 961 [2019]). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:57 pm
” In lieu of granting appeal, the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of the Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:15 pm
In a dissenting opinion, Senior Judge Davis succinctly explained why the majority’s “crabbed plausibility analysis” was wrong: 3. [read post]