Search for: "People v Denis" Results 901 - 920 of 15,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2020, 10:45 am
Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); another based on Cuyler v. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 3:16 am
The Court held that since, pursuant to Penal Law § 70.25 [2-a], the consecutive sentence was a direct consequence of the plea, the court's failure to advise the defendant at the time of the plea that his sentence would run consecutively to the undischarged sentence on his prior conviction prevented his plea from being knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Hill,9 NY3d 189, 191 [2007], cert denied 553 US â€â [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:07 am
Diaz-Castaneda, 494 F.3d 1146, 1152 (9th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 128 S. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
Judges and most other people have no tolerance for bullsh*t. [read post]
In Ashers, the Court concluded that the baker did not deny Mr Lee his cake because he is gay (or because he associates with LGBT+ people) but rather because the cake he wanted bore a message the baker did not wish to print. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 8:23 pm by Donald Thompson
 Affirming the Third Department’s holding, the Court of Appeals held that “this case is not akin to Guzman where the prospective juror confirmed that a sign language interpreter would allow him to follow the proceedings verbatim,” since in Guay, no alternative accommodations were requested or discussed (People v Guay, 18 NY3d 16, 23 [2011]).Along these lines, the Fourth Department noted that “[i]t is well established that ‘[a] juror who has not… [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 6:39 am
Subscription RequiredNEW YORK COUNTY Criminal Practice Dismissal of Child Endangerment Charges Denied; Statute Imposes Sanctions for Likelihood of Harm People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:14 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Inasmuch as defendant failed to check out of the hotel by the required time, he "lost his [legitimate] expectation of privacy in the hotel room and its contents, and the [owner] of the hotel had the authority to consent to the search" by the police (People v D'Antuono, 306 AD2d 890, lv denied 100 NY2d 593, 641). [read post]