Search for: "People v Poole" Results 901 - 920 of 1,413
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 6:26 pm
Titles V and VI - Relaxation of mandatory Exchange Act registration standard for record holders Increases number of record holders triggering mandatory registration to 2,000, no more than 500 of which may be unaccredited Excludes holders of employee benefit plan securities Increases thresholds for bank holding companies Implementation: Effective immediately. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:49 pm by James Saksa
  On top of that, higher leverage means greater return on equity, and fewer shareholders means fewer people you need to split the profits with. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
    So, do you remember the article I posted the other day about accounting for a pool of loans and how values are based on assumptions about the performance of the pool into the future? [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 2:20 pm by Prof. Rick Sander, guest-blogging
A further insult was that the paper had been included in an amicus brief submitted by opponents of affirmative action urging the Supreme Court to hear [Fisher v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by nflatow
Without the individual mandate, people would be free to wait to buy insurance until they needed expensive medical care, which would undercut the role of insurance as a pooling of risk. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by JB
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:44 am by Edward Hartnett
  Interestingly, he suggested tying this case to the anti-commandeering principle of New York v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:15 am by Lucy
This case indicates that the MCA has come of age in one important area of equality and human rights: restraint of disabled people by the police. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 9:06 am by Steve Hall
In 2010, he was the lead attorney for the plaintiffs in Lewis v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
   And to draw people to that pool, Congress chose an incentive: a penalty for failure to get the insurance, with the penalty calculated by one’s taxable income and payable to the IRS, not just once but until they obtain coverage. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:20 am by James Hamilton
HR 3606 would also remove SEC restrictions that prevent crowdfunding so entrepreneurs can raise equity capital from a large pool of small investors. [read post]