Search for: "People v Weeks" Results 901 - 920 of 15,544
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2021, 12:05 pm by NCC Staff
In this spirit, Professor Codrington argues, the American people should now pass a constitutional amendment affirmatively guaranteeing the right to vote in order to overturn the Court’s decisions in Shelby County v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
” The Supreme Court declined to consider a case seeking to overturn the Court’s prior ruling in National Cable and Telecommunications Association v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:40 am
CopyrightThe Kluwer Copyright blog has a couple of posts this week. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 10:56 pm
We hope you enjoy this week's show, and as always, we look forward to your comments and feedback. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 5:00 am by Erica Woodruff
   Less than a week later, on June 13, 2011, the Supreme Court clarified the definition of “mak[ing] a statement” under Rule 10b-5 in Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Iowa was the only state with a lifetime ban on voting for people convicted of a felony. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am by Nasir Pasha, Esq.
At the end of each day, Quickly keeps all the fares from the people he picked up during the day. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 1:51 am by Orin Kerr
Steeves, 525 F.2d 33, 38 (8th Cir. 1975) (upholding a warrant on the basis that "people who own pistols generally keep them at home or on their persons"); United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
The police encountered twelve people at the home, but Bowen was not among them. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:46 am
But as the Third Department's decision last week in People v Revette, 2008 NY Slip Op 01452 demonstrates, this does not mean an Indictment cannot be dismissed because of such a relationship. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:00 am by Attorney Theodore Ronca
A decision issued this week, on 5/1/12, “Zamora v Neurologic Assn. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Representatives Kevin Brady (R-Texas) and Richard Neal (D-Mass.) argued for replacing the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), an amendment to the Social Security Act that reduces payments for people whose careers involved work in both the public and private sectors. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:17 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the People v Asmar the prosecution sought permission to adduce evidence about the defendant’s past with the complainant. [read post]