Search for: "People v. Bias"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 4:10 pm
Parmanand Katara, Advocate v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Novel tech can promote sociotech harms like bias, mis/disinformation and social/environmental destruction. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:01 am
Annuities v. lump sums: younger people opted for the annuity versus the lump sum more than older people across all conditions. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 5:44 am
For example, in Sepulveda v. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 9:16 am
A formula can also reduce bias problems, if done correctly. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 8:57 am
Chart of EEOC Charges 1997-2009 Like I just said... people like charts! [read post]
23 May 2022, 4:00 am
… Attorney with a LifeMaking the shift from people-pleasing to altruism Are you a people pleaser? [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
Supreme Court case of Virginia v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 11:31 am
In 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Bostock v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 9:19 am
Shaare Tefila Congregation v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 4:09 am
Supreme Court” in McGirt v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 7:18 am
They indicated that the district courts actions allowed people who may have harbored a bias based on Mr. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 10:56 am
The same applies to a bias about the case; tell the court, which will excuse you. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 12:32 pm
” The ruling came in the case of Jackson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:00 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
Suppose that some bit of statutory language is unconstitutional because enacted for an illicit purpose (racial or gender bias, say), but that invalidating that language would leave a legal vacuum of the sort that the NY Court of Appeals worried about in People v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
Add to this the overlay of racial bias — the people who decide how much risk is too much normally have a different skin color than the people who are tagged as the sources of the risk — and you seem to have all of the pieces in place for a large escalation in severity. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 12:08 pm
In the first of these two cases, James v. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 12:42 pm
The case caption is State of Minnesota v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 7:16 am
What became known as the Baldus study was the centerpiece of the Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
