Search for: "People v. Christian" Results 901 - 920 of 1,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2022, 8:29 am by Eugene Volokh
(Certainly a reasonable evangelical Christian could view these words as denigrating and showing hostility.) [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am by Marci Hamilton
 Smith generated a furious bipartisan political backlash led by conservative Christians as part of a group called the Coalition for the Free Exercise of Religion. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:00 pm
In Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by GuestPost
[Case Reference: Mary Stokes (on behalf of her son John Stokes) v Christian Brothers’ High School, Clonmel and The Department of Education and Skills 7 December 2010 Equality Officer Decision DEC-S2010-056)] Related PostsNovember 5, 2010 -- Underspending on Schools: Violating the Right to Education? [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
” Instead, the community decides public policy and how it restricts or favors freedom.Cuomo opposed the idea of a Christian nation, and said Christians and non-Christians should do that too. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 11:52 am by Tara Hofbauer
Wells discussed recent developments in Al Warafi v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
It reminds me of the Duggars and their brand of right-wing Christianity. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 7:36 am by Erwin Chemerinsky and Howard Gillman
Galloway, which found no constitutional violation when a local government had almost exclusively Christian clergy deliver invocations, which were often explicitly Christian in content, over a long period of time. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 12:26 pm by Michael Ginsborg
01/13/10 Christian Science MonitorGerry Shih, Same-Sex Marriage Case, Day 3: The Defense Pushes Back, 01/13/10 NY Times "The Bay Area"Liveblogging Perry v Schwarzenegger – Day 3, Parts 1, 2, 3 and 4, 01/13/10 FireDogLake NewsBob Egelko, Trial topic: Is anti-gay bias still a problem? [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 6:37 am by Joshua Matz
Politico discuses why – in light of the decision by the Eleventh Circuit striking down the Act’s “individual mandate” provision – the Court is now very likely to review the constitutionality of the Act, while the editorial board of the Christian Science Monitor urges the Court to support what it describes as a “long-term trend toward people taking charge of their health – and not having others make decisions for them. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:31 am by Eugene Volokh
When it comes to access to government property (other than a traditional public forum), content-neutral (and content-based but viewpoint-neutral) restrictions must merely be reasonable, see Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
14 Mar 2018, 9:42 am by Amy Howe
It is not clear what a ruling for the centers in this case would mean for those laws, but the potential parallels mean that a lot of people will be watching this case closely. [read post]