Search for: "People v. Davis"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2011, 5:31 pm
And appellate courts have repeatedly rejected challenges to these arbitrarily time limits (see People v Jean, 75 NY2d 744 [trial court did not abuse its discretion in limiting counsel questioning to 15 minutes in first two rounds and 10 minutes in third round of voir dire]; People v Davis, 166 AD2d 453 [2d Dept], lv denied 76 NY2d 985 [1990] [15 minute restriction in first round followed by 10 minutes in second and third rounds not an abuse of… [read post]
25 Oct 2006, 8:36 am
" (People v Selassie, 140 Misc.2d 616, 619 [NY Sup Ct Bronx County 1988].) [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:17 am
The critical decision was, I think, Davis. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
If yes, the law is little changed as a practical matter, and the same people will be convicted, by and large. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 1:43 am
People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Davis, Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
United States, 16-8996, Davis v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am
Davis, 454 U.S. 370 (1982) (per curiam) (upholding a forty-year sentence for possession of nine ounces of marijuana with the intent to distribute); Rummel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 4:55 am
The court then shifted to reliance on the US Supreme Court’s subsequent decision in Davis v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 5:41 am
More Blogs: Walz v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 2:30 pm
" (Steve Korris, "Davis lectures Starcher in insurance opinion", Aug. 16; Strahin v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:39 pm
Years later, we had the V-Roys from back east -- but that's another post entirely. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:26 pm
The style of the case is, Ford Bacon & Davis, L.L.C. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The challengers in California v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
See the comments of Laidlaw J.A. in Davis v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently issued a decision (in Baca v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:54 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:59 am
Not good [Sam Bieler via Scott Greenfield, Jacob Sullum] Judge rules that New Jersey may not automatically suspend driving privileges over unpaid child support without a hearing to establish willfulness, lest it violate due process and fundamental fairness [New Jersey Law Journal; Kavadas v. [read post]
