Search for: "People v. Givens"
Results 901 - 920
of 17,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
The answer that people gave was that as long as limits on association were symmetrical between the races, they were constitutional.We can see this logic at work in Pace v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:29 am
Kelo v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 1:43 pm
Given the 114 degree heat this week, I've had several calls from people wanting to know whether illnesses caused by excessive heat while working outdoors are compensable. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:17 am
It's a given that Dusseldorf will do so, but things take very long up there. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:08 am
The Court’s pending case in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
Should K.C. be given special protection? [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 4:06 pm
J.L.C. v K.A.A. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:48 am
In 2008, Eugene, Andy Koppelman, and I appeared on a Federalist Society panel on “Freedom of Speech v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:06 am
In the wake of last week’s pathbreaking International Court of Justice order of provisional measures concerning alleged genocide in Gaza, much reaction has rightly addressed the ramifications for international diplomacy, Israel, South Africa, the United States and the Palestinian people. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 9:44 am
Deweese-Boyd v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:26 am
V. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:33 am
Dulaney v. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Words are given their ordinary meanings unless special definitions are provided. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:40 am
Given the trickiness of forum analysis, legal compliance and planning is necessary in setting up a page. [read post]
26 May 2015, 2:00 pm
Courts have recognized that under Penal Law § 35.10(1) a parent may use physical force against a child when he reasonably believes it to be necessary to promote discipline or the child's welfare (see Fields, 134 AD2dat 365; see People v Prue, 219 AD2d 873 [4th Dept 1995]; People v Thompson, 9 Misc 3d 1123[A] [City Ct, Westchester County 2005]). [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 8:24 am
Case Citation: Will Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Blueford v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:41 pm
Today's ruling in Latif v. [read post]
