Search for: "People v. Vice" Results 901 - 920 of 2,208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2009, 2:00 pm
The Executive Comp people never know what the Labor people are working on, and vice versa. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Constitutional Criminal Procedure In her book, Kwall discusses the American constitutional case of Dickerson v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 7:10 pm by David
In light of Tuesday’s Supreme Court ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2020, 5:45 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent decision by the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia in Downey v. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:01 pm by MOTP
" The letter also stated that Carter deferred part of his salary and that the chamber executive vice president was also asked to defer his salary because the chamber was in a "cash crunch" and the chamber "showed a $40,425 profit when it should have shown a $61,782 loss. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
  As a matter of constitutional interpretation, Hoke v U.S., 227 U.S. 308 (1913) seemed to suggest that Congress had the power to block movement of people across state lines for any purpose whatsoever. [read post]
Vice President Mike Pence was presiding over the Senate during the vote, and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris was also present, so the building likely satisfied the requirement that it contain a “person protected by the Secret Service. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 1:20 pm
" (To read more about the case of Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:56 pm
 KAT: Not many people outside INTA’s corridors of power have an idea what the organisation’s Vice Presidents do. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:25 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Since the Supreme Court ruled that the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution entitled same-sex couples to equal treatment with married heterosexual couples under federal law in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  And it is not only the presidential debates but the vice-presidential debates as well. [read post]
10 Oct 2016, 11:20 am
We hold that engaging in e-mail communications with people in Minnesota may constitute the unauthorized practice of law in Minnesota, in violation of Minn. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]