Search for: "Person v. Company"
Results 901 - 920
of 31,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2024, 11:44 am
The bus company appealed. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:24 am
That said, it would appear sensible to do so particularly in cases such as this, where companies operate in the same sector with similar marks, and so the chances of a claim are heightened. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:42 pm
” Eisenberg v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 7:24 am
” As stated by Justice Rehnquist in his concurring opinion in Industrial Union Dept., AFL-CIO v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am
Strickley v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:40 pm
Taamneh and Gonzalez v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 3:47 pm
The order does not require any other person or entity to depublish their articles or other pertinent materials. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:35 pm
Discovery Company. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
The case of Ellison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
The case of Ellison v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
Item 303 is an administrative rule that requires a company to disclose known trends or uncertainties that are likely to have a material impact on its financial position, regardless of whether the company had made any statements that would otherwise be misleading. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
In July 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order on Promoting Competition in the American Economy (available here), urging, among other things, a “revitalization of merger oversight under the Bank Merger Act and the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:45 pm
And tomorrow, Thursday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
Count 1 asserts a claim against certain company directors for allowing management to use the company planes primarily for personal use, and for failing to put in place safeguards even after being notified of the issue. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2023 decision in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
Harmon v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
This was based on company policy directing that, in the event of an accident or injury on any company property, the person involved was required to immediately advise their direct supervisor. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
This was based on company policy directing that, in the event of an accident or injury on any company property, the person involved was required to immediately advise their direct supervisor. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
But last week, as you’ve probably heard, Elon Musk did not get the outcome he was hoping for in the Tornetta v. [read post]
