Search for: "Picket"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,071
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
As negotiations continued without an agreement, teachers engaged in concerted actions, including weekly picketing in front of a school. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
When unions picket a construction site to warn about a non-union contractor’s destruction of area wage and labor standards, the First Amendment does not give them unlimited protection for their actions. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:16 pm
As a volunteer leader this is something that must be nurtured and intentionally planned for or else the day-to-day worries of the dog poop, unweeded lot, oversized car and broken gate pickets become all consuming. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 3:30 pm
Likewise, if Vic tells Don, “stop burning this flag / displaying this cartoon of Mohammed / picketing with this sign, or I’ll kill you,” Don must abandon his First-Amendment-protected activity or else lose the right to defend himself with lethal force against Vic. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:36 am
It’s right there between the Second Amendment and the Fourth Amendment, the amendment most likely to be written on a picketer’s protest sign and the amendment most likely to result in the exclusion of evidence at trial, respectively. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 9:06 am
Logo, Trademarks, Graphics: Similarly, the Advice Memo concluded that the prohibition against using the Company’s logo, trademarks or graphics could reasonably be interpreted by employees to prohibit the use of the Company’s logo or trademark while engaging in Section 7 communications, including photos of picket signs, cartoons or electronic leaflets. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:38 am
., that policy is, on its face, an overly restrictive ban on employees’ rights to engage in protected concerted activity: We further find that the portion of the rule prohibiting employees from photographing or videotaping the Employer’s premises is unlawful as such a prohibition would reasonably be interpreted to prevent employees from using social media to communicate and share information regarding their Section 7 activities through pictures or videos, such as of employees engaged in… [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 4:38 am
., that policy is, on its face, an overly restrictive ban on employees’ rights to engage in protected concerted activity: We further find that the portion of the rule prohibiting employees from photographing or videotaping the Employer’s premises is unlawful as such a prohibition would reasonably be interpreted to prevent employees from using social media to communicate and share information regarding their Section 7 activities through pictures or videos, such as of employees engaged in… [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 11:33 am
As in the past, the GC demonstrated little understanding of federal intellectual property laws by asserting that employee use of company names, trademarks, and logos on electronic leaflets, cartoons, and picket signs is permissible under the NLRA and that intellectual property laws offer employers no protection from such use. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 7:28 am
The group has picketed outside the restaurant to shame the owners for firing a server for voicing concerns over safety issues. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
” But, Judge Howell notes that while picketing could seem, to some observers, to be an attempt to exert pressure on the Court, 40 U.S.C. sec. 6135 sweeps much more broadly than just that, reaching not just picketers but also many others who have assembled on the Plaza for a variety of other reasons. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:32 am
Mulhall (about bargaining away labor rights - employer promised not to oppose union representation and granted union access to its property, and union agreed to forego rights to picket, boycott, etc.). [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 7:01 am
Additionally, if recognized as the exclusive bargaining agent for the casino’s employees, the union promised to refrain from picketing, boycotting, striking, or undertaking other economic activity against it. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 7:05 pm
At its June 13, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the constitutionality of the president’s recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board, the constitutionality of a state law requiring pre-abortion ultrasounds, whether habeas proceedings can be used to challenge sex offender registration, common law immunity for foreign officials acting on behalf of foreign states, and whether equitable tolling is available under the Hague… [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 9:47 am
It is not clear whether the new rule would ban a single picket from going on the plaza wearing or carrying a sign — the kind of activity by a Maryland college student that was explicitly involved in the case that led to Judge Howell’s decision. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 6:09 am
Here are the leading legal headlines from Wise Law on Twitter for Wednesday, June 12, 2013:Ethics: Lawyer Has Professional Duty to Know Tech ABA - Formal Opinion on Judges' Use of Social Media 282 current and former female mounties join RCMP sexual harassment class-action lawsuit Prosecutors ask French court to drop pimping charges against Dominique Strauss-Kahn EU wants privacy guarantees from U.S. amid PRISM crisis SCC hearing on Thursday: Sex work, security of the person and the Supreme Court of… [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 6:57 am
Would you cross a picket line? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:38 am
United Food and Commercial WorkersCharter of Rights and Freedoms: The United Food and Commercial Workers union recorded a video and took photos of individuals crossing a picket line during a strike. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 7:05 am
In the case, a Colorado appeals court enjoined anti-abortion protesters who were picketing a church they believed had gone astray from displaying gruesome images of mutilated fetuses or dead bodies in a manner reasonably likely to be viewed by children. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:49 am
There are countless examples of people who belong to “union affiliated” groups who picket, handbill, boycott and take other action on behalf of a union’s cause, all with some manifestation of acceptance by the union, whose conduct escapes punishment under the Act because the NLRB deems them not to be an agents of the union. [read post]
