Search for: "Pilot v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,511
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2012, 4:21 pm
See Pennington v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 6:19 am
Allied Pilots Association. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Bill BuxtonMicrosoft ResearchOriginal: Jan. 12, 2007Version: March 2, 2012 Keywords / Search Terms Multi-touch, multitouch, input, interaction, touch screen, touch tablet, multi-finger input, multi-hand input, bi-manual input, two-handed input, multi-person input, interactive surfaces, soft machine, hand gesture, gesture recognition . [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 4:24 pm
"When you're a pilot, you understand why moths fly into candles," says Rodney V. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:11 pm
This is not to say the private sector won’t have to make changes as well, because anyone litigating in Florida should take eDiscovery seriously given recent cases like Coquina Investments v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:10 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
Lots of proponents of the use of drones in warfare tout fewer pilots put at risk in dangerous missions, but what about the financial cost of drones v. manned aircraft? [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 4:20 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
June 23, 2011) (allegation that defendant “failed to train, warn or educate” physicians failed to state a plausible claim because no such duty exists); Lemon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 8:30 am
Hester v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 5:20 pm
There are two recent developments at the EEOC that should be on the radar of all employers, HR professionals, and employment attorneys: The commission’s new pilot program on direct investigations of compensation practices, with the goal of rooting out gender-based pay bias even before any discrimination charge has been filed, and The agency’s commitment to hone in on discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals in the wake of its Macy… [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 10:26 am
A panel of lawyers urged Congress today to adopt legislation that would undo the Supreme Court’s decision in Federal Aviation Administration v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:49 am
I am sure the pilots will be expecting me to demand a more exotic location than NI. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:49 pm
Moreover, in contrast to states like Arizona, which require employers within their states to use the federal government’s E-Verify pilot program to verify their employees’ work eligibility, in 2007 Illinois sought to prohibit use of E-Verify within the state until concerns about the accuracy, effectiveness, and privacy of the new federal database system could be resolved. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 3:10 pm
You can read Joe Cohen's piece on Gimex v The Chillbag Company here. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 10:29 am
[v] Despite the preemption of state causes of action, 46 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 10:42 am
The style of the case is, Chemical Express Carriers, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
