Search for: "Powers v. Thomas" Results 901 - 920 of 5,407
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2022, 4:26 am by Emma Snell
Ken Thomas reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
The BBC covers a proposed Criminal Procedure (Identification) law that would give sweeping powers to law enforcement agencies to collect biometric data, which has sparked concerns over privacy. [read post]
6 May 2022, 7:36 am
Sunstein The question of whether federal agencies or the courts should have the right to interpret legislation may seem technical, but it significantly affects the power of the government" (NYRB)(reviewing "The Chevron Doctrine: Its Rise and Fall, and the Future of the Administrative State"by Thomas W. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
Moreover, the oral argument last December strongly indicated that five Justices—Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Barrett—were inclined to overrule Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Politico: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 4:36 pm by Jeffrey Rosen
Those text are Thomas Jefferson’s Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom in Virginia, drafted in 1777, and Justice Brandeis’s opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Aaron Nielson
For my presentation, I focused on 1973’s National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The same blog has also published an article on the recent decisions in The Queen on the application of Privacy International v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2022] EWHC 770 QB and Her Majesty’s Attorney General for England and Wales v British Broadcasting Corporation [2022] EWHC 826 (QB), on the topic of closed judgments. [read post]
1 May 2022, 8:54 am by Eric Goldman
Martono * 2H 2020 Quick Links, Part 4 (FOSTA) * Justice Thomas’ Anti-Section 230 Statement Doesn’t Support Reconsideration–JB v. [read post]