Search for: "Price v. Price" Results 901 - 920 of 18,261
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Hamilton Textiles v Estate of Mate, 269 AD2d 214 [2000]; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483 [1998]). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:18 am by Florian Mueller
Google argues that the class action lawyers went too far, and on that basis has appealed to the Ninth Circuit the district court's decision to certify a consumer class:Ninth Circuit appeal no. 22-80140; Mary Carr, et al v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:49 am by Frank Heft
§3583(h) in a case of first impression             In United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:28 am by John Jascob
At issue is whether a defendant in a securities class action may rebut the presumption of classwide reliance recognized in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
Click to enlarge.PFC = prima facie caseLNR = legitimate, non-discriminatory reasonPrice-Waterhouse = Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:04 am by Buce
 A moment's reflection  will tell you there is no reason on God's green earth to expect that all shares will sell at the same unit price as a single share. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Texaco Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:57 am by sally
High Court (Chancery Division) Price & Anor v Nunn [2012] EWHC 1251 (Ch) (11 May 2012) Paton & Anor v Todd [2012] EWHC 1248 (Ch) (11 May 2012) Hughmans Solicitors v Central Stream Services Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1222 (Ch) (11 May 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Deutsche Bank Ag v Total Global Steel Ltd [2012] EWHC 1201 (Comm) (11 May 2012) European Group Ltd & Ors v Chartis Insurance UK Ltd. [2012] EWHC 1245 (Comm) (11… [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:42 pm
., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications in order to address the question of whether a Section 2 “price squeeze” claim is viable under the Sherman Act if the defendant has no duty to deal. [read post]