Search for: "Price v. Price"
Results 901 - 920
of 18,261
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2021, 3:02 am
Hamilton Textiles v Estate of Mate, 269 AD2d 214 [2000]; Estate of Burke v Repetti & Co., 255 AD2d 483 [1998]). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 11:18 am
Google argues that the class action lawyers went too far, and on that basis has appealed to the Ninth Circuit the district court's decision to certify a consumer class:Ninth Circuit appeal no. 22-80140; Mary Carr, et al v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:49 am
§3583(h) in a case of first impression In United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 8:28 am
At issue is whether a defendant in a securities class action may rebut the presumption of classwide reliance recognized in Basic Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:36 pm
GE Betz, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Loral Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 7:03 am
Harris v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 12:28 pm
In Veera v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:56 pm
Click to enlarge.PFC = prima facie caseLNR = legitimate, non-discriminatory reasonPrice-Waterhouse = Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 6:36 am
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:04 am
A moment's reflection will tell you there is no reason on God's green earth to expect that all shares will sell at the same unit price as a single share. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
Shutte v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Texaco Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 12:28 pm
(Owens v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:18 pm
Chesser v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 1:57 am
High Court (Chancery Division) Price & Anor v Nunn [2012] EWHC 1251 (Ch) (11 May 2012) Paton & Anor v Todd [2012] EWHC 1248 (Ch) (11 May 2012) Hughmans Solicitors v Central Stream Services Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1222 (Ch) (11 May 2012) High Court (Commercial Court) Deutsche Bank Ag v Total Global Steel Ltd [2012] EWHC 1201 (Comm) (11 May 2012) European Group Ltd & Ors v Chartis Insurance UK Ltd. [2012] EWHC 1245 (Comm) (11… [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 1:43 pm
C. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 4:03 pm
In Calhoun County v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 3:42 pm
., dba AT&T California v. linkLine Communications in order to address the question of whether a Section 2 “price squeeze” claim is viable under the Sherman Act if the defendant has no duty to deal. [read post]