Search for: "Public Citizen v. Kennedy"
Results 901 - 920
of 920
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2007, 4:41 am
And while he seems more open to embracing a positive vision of race and thinking about the state's inevitable role in constructing identity, his vision may also be more tied to context and less generalizable across cases.In my view, the story of Kennedy's opinion in the desegregation cases began not with Bakke or Grutter, but with a voting-rights decision issued last year in a case called League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) v. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 8:09 am
After Michigan's Board of Canvassers approved for Michigan's November 2006 general election ballot a citizen-initiated proposal ("Proposal 2") that would amend Michigan's constitution to prohibit all sex- and race-based preferences in public education, public employment, and public contracting,Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross-Appellees Operation King's Dream, along with other organizations and individuals, brought suit under Section 2 of… [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Kennedy
• US v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 7:29 am
And in 1896, the Court in Plessy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:03 pm
In Cheney v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:20 am
The case I'm referring to is United Haulers v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:29 am
Public Citizen: an agency is not the legal cause of an action it was required to take, Finally, the Court distinguished TVA v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
Justice Alito writes for the majority plurality in Hein v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 11:55 am
Stone wrote in the wake of Gonzales v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 12:04 pm
We will not, therefore, “entertain citizen suits to vindicate the public’s nonconcrete interest in the proper administration of the laws. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:50 am
Kennedy, who suggested that airing ads close to election was perhaps the best way to have a "political dialogue" because the public tunes out until that time. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
We will not, therefore, “entertain citizen suits to vindicate the public’s nonconcrete interest in the proper administration of the laws. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:44 pm
The following Mass v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 8:03 am
Kennedy participating. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
Perhaps Phillip Morris USA v. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 2:17 am
See also Burson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
Prior to that, local lore holds that many traditions — the dressing ("mumming") from England, Sweden and other countries — came on New Year's Day when at midnight, the citizens shot off guns to welcome the new year, a dangerous tradition that the law frowns upon. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
Reynolds v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 9:54 am
Seattle School District (05-908) and Meredith v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 8:16 am
Morse v. [read post]
