Search for: "Quick v. United States"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 8:08 am
Kuehner, 194 N.J. 6, 20 (2008) (quoting State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 10:02 pm
Coetzee is in the US, where he notes Bridgeman v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 12:35 pm
FCC Statement on Comcast v. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 6:22 am
Last night, the White House announced that President Trump will nominate acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco to be the next solicitor general of the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
In Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Having started off with the holiday, this has been a relatively slow week on the antitrust front in the United States. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2016, 11:54 pm
United States Rolling Stone magazine has urged judges to overturn the libel verdict against them over fabricated story about University of Virginia rape. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
I have two quick observations. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:06 pm
In this regard, it is reminiscent of the early Sherman Act decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
Here is a picture of the front entrance of the store: Anyway, to the surprise of not a single trademark attorney, Dirt Cheap recently filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against Cheap Cheap in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri (Case No. 4:10-cv-01198), alleging that the CHEAP CHEAP trademark is likely to cause confusion with Dirt Cheap’s registered DIRT CHEAP and FUN FUN CHEAP CHEAP trademarks. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 8:22 am
A unanimous Second Circuit panel opinion this morning in US v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 2:11 pm
In October 2014, the Company developed an arbitration program that applied to all Associates working at retail stores in the United States. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
This issue came up a few years ago in United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:08 am
§ 78u-4 (“Reform Act”), should be applied less rigorously in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:48 am
District Court for the District of Columbia in P.J.E.S. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:35 am
This notion of allowing the difficult matter to be worked out in the political process... she won't make a connection. *** In my Constitutional Law II exam last spring, written before the Supreme Court's decision in Windsor, I began a question this way (boldface added): Here’s a section from one of the briefs in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:09 am
Elizondo, 428 Mass. 322, 324, 701 N.E.2d 325 (1998), quoting from United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
The underlying case was Rowatt v. [read post]
