Search for: "Randy Barnett" Results 901 - 920 of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2010, 8:23 am by Kurt Lash
The day before oral arguments, Columbia Professor Philip Hamburger posted a paper presenting almost the exact opposite view of Privileges or Immunities as that advocated by Gura and scholars like Randy Barnett. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 7:01 pm by Guest Blogger
Consider in particular the past arguments of Randy Barnett, who more than anyone is the intellectual godfather of the anti-ACA movement:1. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm by Ilya Somin
Co-blogger Randy Barnett is filing his own amicus brief along with the Cato Institute and Competitive Enterprise Institute. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:58 pm by NCC Staff
Common-Good Constitutionalism Reveals the Dangers of Any Non-Originalist Approach to the Constitution By Randy Barnett, Carmack Waterhouse Professor of Legal Theory, Georgetown University Law Center Randy E. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
Also, from Ann Althouse — who, like me, Somin, and Barnett, but unlike Milbank, Lithwick or Shelso, is actually a professor of Constitutional Law — “Since the Repeal Amendment, proposed by Randy Barnett, can easily be portrayed as an effort to return to something closer to the balance of power provided for in the original Constitution, it is pretty silly to portray yourself as brimming with respect for the Founders when what you really support is the… [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:37 pm by Brian Tamanaha
[Postscript: As the article indicates, Randy Barnett is a leading conservative activist for a convention. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Joe Consumer
, here's someone who did not make our hypocrite list today: conservative constitutional lawyer Randy E. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:00 pm by Joe Consumer
, here's someone who did not make our hypocrite list today: conservative constitutional lawyer Randy E. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 3:11 pm by Ilya Somin
The "right-wing think tank" study cited by Ensign and DeMint was actually coauthored by co-blogger Randy Barnett, one of the nation's most prominent constitutional law scholars, and an expert on the original meaning of the Commerce Clause (the provision usually cited as authorizing Congress to impose the mandate). [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 10:49 pm by Orin Kerr
Randy Barnett has acknowledged that when the mandate debate began, he thought it “a long shot” just to make it to the Supreme Court (much less to win). [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 10:14 pm by Orin Kerr
That was the key move Randy Barnett introduced, and the four key Justices the challengers needed seemed to accept it. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 2:13 pm by Paul Horwitz
I noticed it because a post today by Randy Barnett, titled "'Judicial engagement' is not the same as "'judicial activism,'" has the sub-hed "Critics of George Will and Clark Neily's defense of 'judicial engagement' are attacking a straw man." [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 12:20 pm
https://t.co/vnedm8fiZQ— Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) December 25, 2017I don't pay attention to Ben Shapiro because why should anyone? [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 12:20 pm
https://t.co/vnedm8fiZQ— Randy Barnett (@RandyEBarnett) December 25, 2017I don't pay attention to Ben Shapiro because why should anyone? [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 4:33 pm by BDG
  One was raised by Randy Barnett and his co-authors in a Heritage white-paper back in December. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 5:30 am by Josh Blackman
Some legal scholars, including my colleague Randy Barnett, argued that the federal mandate was beyond Congress's powers. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 8:50 am
" New originalists such as Keith Whittington and Randy Barnett assert that the turn to emphasizing the public meaning of the Constitution, along with other improvements, has enabled originalism to answer the most serious objections leveled against it. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:08 am by Tony Mauro
Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett, a leading strategist for the challengers to the law, told the audience, "The smart money is always on the Supreme Court upholding an act of Congress. [read post]