Search for: "Rich v. Rich"
Results 901 - 920
of 3,698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2019, 9:59 pm
By Joshua Rich -- In this case, the question ultimately answered by the Federal Circuit was a straightforward question of statutory interpretation: in determining whether a party is time-barred from filing a petition for inter partes review because a privy of that party or the real party in interest was served with a complaint alleging infringement of the challenged patent, at what point in time should privity or party interests be determined? [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
A recent decision of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court goes to the heart of all this, as Katfriend Hugo Cox (Hamlins LLP) explains.Here's what Hugo writes:Energy drink loses its fizz by Hugo CoxA recent judgment of the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, ATB Sales v Rich Energy, illustrates the potential significance of copyright law in the protection of brands.Whyte Bikes successfully sued Rich Energy drinks for infringing the copyright in their… [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
In its amicus brief supporting the Government, R Street (Charles Duan) argued that only rich pharmaceutical companies are bringing these cases. [read post]
15 Jun 2019, 8:00 am
Even in Chapter Two -- where I unapologetically set out the sophisticated constitutional theory advanced in the postwar era by political scientists/philosophers like Willmoore Kendall, Martin Diamond, and Harry V. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 3:03 pm
Red Deer Antlers Author: Mehmet KaratayLicence: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 unportedSource: Wikipedia Antler Jane Lambert Intellectual Property Enterprise Court (HH Judge Melissa Clarke) ARB Sakes Ltd v Rich Energy Ltd. and Others [2019] EWHC 1207 (IPEC) 9 May 2019 This was a copyright infringement claim. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 3:35 pm
“Our members are a target-rich environment for those with loose patent claims,” NRF’s Stephanie Martz told the subcommittee. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am
Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:02 pm
By Joshua Rich -- In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court today held that federal government agencies cannot avail themselves of America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant proceedings. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 9:02 pm
By Joshua Rich -- In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court today held that federal government agencies cannot avail themselves of America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant proceedings. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
As Kersch comments, in both of these widely seen film series, “Roe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2019)This post is the third of a series of three posts in which the CPE WGE examine the question of paths to empire performed through the choices being made by the U.S. and Chinese leadership cores [领导核心] within the theater of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 9:28 am
Y sont étudiés des questions transversales de droit international général, la difficile articulation entre les transports et la protection de l’environnement, les obstacles à une véritable intégration économique des transports au niveau international, ou encore les spécificités de la mise en œuvre du droit international public dans le domaine des transports. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 9:34 am
Wodehouse v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 4:17 am
Causes of action that accrue under state law prior to the filing of a bankruptcy petition, as well as those that accrue as a result of the filing, are property of the estate (see Johnson, Blakely, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, P.A. v Alvarez [In re Alvarez], 224 F3d 1273, 1277-1278 [11th Cir]; Winick & Rich, P.C. v Strada Design Assocs. [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:45 am
The following evidence inter alia was cited in opposition proceedings:D1: WO 02/15713D2: EP 0949329D3: DE 10163964D6: WO 02/051873D9: WO 95/21240D10: WO 97/29179D15: WO 96/22366D17: WO 00/70064D18: Kunze, "Technology Brewing and Malting", VLB Berlin, 1996, p. 83-87.The following evidence was filed with the appellant's statement setting out the grounds of appeal:D19: Excerpt from Südzucker Handbuch, "Erfrischungsgetränke", 2000D20: Leitsatz für… [read post]
28 May 2019, 3:00 am
Campbell v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am
This Memorial Day we are once again firing up the grill with hundred dollar bills to celebrate how the ADA its current form encourages litigation that makes lawyers rich without any correspondening improvement in meaningful access for the disabled. [read post]
25 May 2019, 10:01 am
The charges also involved some nonpolitical bad conduct in a dispute with court personnel (omitted from the excerpts below), and also out-of-court public advocacy for and against political candidates, which are also forbidden by Utah judicial ethics rules. [read post]
23 May 2019, 10:10 am
You could sell the data to others or use it yourself to get rich on the stock market. [read post]
