Search for: "Right v. USA" Results 901 - 920 of 4,518
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm by Nietzer
In determining whether or not the judgment will be enforced, the court will evaluate what “comity,” as defined in Hilton v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 1:09 am by INFORRM
  Thus, the offending search results will continue to appear against complainant’s name in the USA, Canada, South Africa, Australia, Japan etc. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 10:03 am by David Post
I’m hopeful that this latest decision — the second time (see Sullivan v Government of USA [2012] EWHC 1680 (Admin)) that a U.K. court has found that U.S. civil commitment procedures violate basic human rights — though from a foreign court interpreting foreign law, will add to the weight and persuasiveness of the constitutional challenges to these schemes. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 7:27 am
Credit Suisse First Boston (USA), Inc., 482 F.3d 372 (5th Cir. 2007); post here. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
The Supreme Court heard oral argument on November 3, 2010 in Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
12 May 2022, 6:51 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In the USA, Black women have an unintended pregnancy rate double that of non-Hispanic White women. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 4:35 am by Amy Howe
At the Stafford Rosenbaum blog, Jeffrey Mandell and Barbara Neider discuss the amicus brief that they filed in the property rights case Murr v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 9:30 am by EEM
Publications:Kim v Russia: The Unlawful Detention of Stateless Persons in Immigration (ENS Blog, Oct. 2014) [text]Litigating Strategically: Stateless Children Born in the EU (ENS Blog, Nov. 2014) [text]Map: Every 10 Minutes, a Stateless Baby is Born (Washington Post's Worldviews Blog, Nov. 2014) [text]"The New Unpeople: Statelessness as Punishment against Political Dissent in the Gulf," The Economist, 15 Nov. 2014 [text]Out of the Shadows: The Treatment of… [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 3:19 pm by Dave Maass
Jim Sensenbrenner (R-WI), the author of the original USA PATRIOT Act, in a case brought by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) against the National Security Agency (NSA). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The petition also fails to adequately allege that ACS violated the Family Medical Leave Act, as petitioner did not assert that he had worked for ACS for 12 months or 1,250 hours, and thus failed to demonstrate that he was an eligible employee under 29 USC § 2611(2)(A)(ii) (see Donahue v Asia TV USA Ltd., 208 F Supp 3d 505, 512 [SD NY 2016]). [read post]