Search for: "Ring v. State"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,772
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 1:47 pm
US v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 4:29 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 11:01 am
6-benzene and the compounds having from 2 to 4 condensed rings, each ring being capable of contributing to the valency layer of the metal M by 6 or 7 ? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 5:38 am
TTAB Affirms Mere Descriptiveness Refusal of "TEA QUILA" for Alcoholic BeveragesTTAB Overrules Disclaimer Requirement for BENEDIKTINER for Beer and Food ServicesTest Your TTAB Judge-Ability: Is "O-RING CONDOM" Merely Descriptive of Condoms? [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 12:33 pm
The recently decided Appellate Division matter of Scianni v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 2:09 am
The case is Case C-97/12 P Louis Vuitton Malletier v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Friis Group International ApS intervening, a ruling of the Eighth Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) of 15 May. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
In our view, IBM’s new patent should fail under the Supreme Court’s Alice v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 3:00 pm
The apple for the day, just to be sure you keep the doctor away, is Apple Inc v. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
Penn State Orange Bowl - ACC Champion (NC? [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:06 pm
“[A]n engagement ring is a gift conditional on the subsequent marriage of the parties” Vann v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2010, 7:40 pm
” State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 10:09 am
However, I do think it's kind of ironic that Judge Cochran starts off with quotes from the dissenting opinion from Abdul-Kabir v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 5:41 am
A short excerpt from Friday's 22,000-word North Carolina Supreme Court opinion in Happel v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
In Gerstein v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 12:08 pm
In the oral argument of Torres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 6:34 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 7:46 am
Tax systems treat taxpayers differently all the time, and the central question before the Court in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
