Search for: "Roberts v. Brown"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2023, 6:06 am
“Expect a shock,” said Michael V. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 12:18 pm
Robert Brown is also quoted as saying “What the court is doing is second-guessing economic analysis that can always be second guessed. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:05 am
Keith Brown, Defendant-Appellant.--- N.Y.S.2d ----, N.Y.A.D. 1 Dept. 2010., 3238_________________________ Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
Brown v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm
Nebraska and Department of Education v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Mark Kende assesses Justice Scalia’s criticism of the role of empirical evidence in Brown v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 11:21 am
" Robert and Barbara Williams v. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 8:07 am
In Trump v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:23 pm
Marbury v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm
In Marsh v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm
In Marsh v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Robert Francois Friedman, for Defendant-Appellee. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 4:13 am
Before the end of the year, Ruffin would author the opinion inState v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 1:28 am
Dec. 18 2009)(Spero, J.); It does: Roberts v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 3:48 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that Benisek and another partisan-gerrymandering case challenging Republican-drawn maps in Wisconsin that was argued in October, Gill v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:48 am
Blind to irony, the majority casts itself in the role of the courageous unanimous court in Brown v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 6:41 am
Garland and Garland v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 7:59 pm
” Brown, Gentry and Stenson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 12:33 am
It is clear that Lazarus does not conceive of the possibility that a Roberts' Court will be anti-majoritarian in its drive to impose it radical reactionary views. for example Lazarus writes: The 19-year period from 1954 (when the court decided Brown v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:57 pm
And it only went downhill from there, as Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson weighed in from the end of the bench with a slightly different theory. [read post]
