Search for: "STATE EX REL. v. Court of Appeals"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,056
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2015, 10:34 am
”) Louisiana ex Rel. [read post]
29 May 2015, 2:24 pm
Note that this is a relatively rare direct appeal from a three-judge district court because it is a congressional redistricting case; more on that later. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:59 pm
United States ex. rel. [read post]
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:03 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:57 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
27 May 2015, 2:12 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:00 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
18 May 2015, 5:23 am
In Taveras ex rel. [read post]
14 May 2015, 5:46 pm
& D.F. ex rel N.F. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:32 am
State v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
Hotak (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Kanu (Appellant) v London Borough of Southwark (Respondent) Johnson (Appellant) v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (Respondent)Crisis & Shelter, EHRC, SS for CLG interveners [2015] UKSC 30 The thing about the Supreme Court is that all those years of accrued, encrusted High Court and Court of Appeal case law just don’t matter. [read post]
11 May 2015, 6:54 am
State ex rel. [read post]
1 May 2015, 6:43 am
The district court’s judgement was reversed in part and the case was remanded (United States of America ex. rel. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 2:39 pm
And that too is pretty rare to see.Aleynikov v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 6:30 am
Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit 2012) (quoting Maynard v. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 6:09 am
By Rebecca Kopp Levine In State ex rel. [read post]
18 Apr 2015, 3:44 pm
There are exceptions to this rule, but those exceptions are limited to situations, for example, where there is a computational error by the Court, (see People ex rel. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 6:53 am
Courts of Appeal taking FAPE in some interesting directions:In Deal v. [read post]
