Search for: "STATE V. MARTINEZ" Results 901 - 920 of 1,661
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am by Evan Lee
An even gloomier portent for the government is the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 2:00 pm by Bexis
Bazarsky, The Future of PennsylvaniaProducts Liability as Applied by Federal and State Courts: Covell v. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In considering a motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7) to dismiss a complaint for failure to state a cause of action, the court must afford the pleading a liberal construction, accept the facts as alleged in the pleading as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Bumpus v New York City Tr. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 6:51 am by Staff Writer
Checking for intoxication at roadside stops became legal after the 1975 United States Supreme Court case United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Where emotional or other nonpecuniary loss is a direct result of a defendant's breach of duty, a plaintiff may recover damages for such loss (see generally Martinez v Long Is. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 1:21 pm
Thus, plaintiff failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract, inasmuch as "no contract of any kind exists between plaintiff and defendant and there is no recognized theory upon which defendant . . . might be held liable to plaintiff, as a third-party beneficiary" (Area Masonry v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 64 AD2d 810, 811). [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
Robles and the the failure of the State Senate to get with the program in 2007 after the Assembly passed the marriage bill), but we can BE married in New York (see Martinez v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 4:42 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Here, accepting all facts as alleged in the amended complaint to be true and according the plaintiff the benefit of every favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88), the amended complaint failed to state a legal malpractice cause of action. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s signed agreement with the nonparty funder, selling a portion of his interest in any potential future litigation proceeds, “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claim as a matter of law,” as it shows that defendants did not commit any misconduct by failing to warn plaintiff of the terms of the agreement (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; see CPLR 3211[a][1]), which plaintiff admittedly signed (see VXI Lux Holdco S.A.R.L.… [read post]