Search for: "STATE v BURNS"
Results 901 - 920
of 3,332
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2007, 12:58 pm
Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief and a declaratory judgment against the City, stating that they desire to engage in ceremonial burning in the future, that their rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments have been violated, and that the City's policies and practices regarding open burning permits are unconstitutional. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 12:06 pm
In United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful, and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 4:31 am
Part four of my series covering the Intentional Acts Exclusion brings us to my home state of New Jersey. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 3:22 am
In 1878, the Court ruled in Wilkerson v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:30 am
At the risk of being untoward, but last month’s Godwin v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 4:30 am
At the risk of being untoward, but last month's Godwin v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 9:00 am
See Siracusano v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 12:18 pm
Rix LJ found it significant Campbell and others v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:57 am
The rules are a reaction to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am
Yet by the majority’s lights, the very act of creating that requirement in order to “safeguard the consumer,” United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
5 May 2017, 6:00 am
Burns Int’l Sec. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Juliana v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:37 pm
Burns and People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 10:07 am
Facts: This case (Reynolds v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 7:25 pm
After getting a chance to actually read the majority and dissenting opinions in Cumo v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 5:57 am
Facts: This case (Loy et al v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:34 am
Staub v. [read post]
