Search for: "STATE v. PATRON"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2009, 5:32 pm
Rishty v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 3:41 am
In Kee v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 11:00 pm
In its heyday Lisboa v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 9:38 am
” Commissioner v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:57 am
Some detective work in the free online Civil Calendar, based on the information provided by the news articles, does provide the docket number in the case, and also tells us that a hearing in the case of Martin v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Somraj Singh, (not precedential) (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and strategic steps DJ David Guetta – DJ David Guetta sues over use of name on compilation album cover: Payday Records, Ultra Records v Thrive Records (The Trademark Blog) Stanford University – Stanford University sues Sir Allen Stanford, patron of West Indian cricket, for trade mark infringement (IPKat) [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 5:05 pm
Numerous federal, state and local statutes prohibit public officials from accepting anything of value precisely because the quid pro quo is never stated but always understood. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 12:46 pm
Reginald Brown v. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am
Kelly v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:10 am
See Wichita State Univ. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 9:49 am
Miller's Ale House, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 3:14 pm
CREW and Trump v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 8:56 am
However, these laws vary greatly from state-to-state, and the dram shop law in Tennessee is more generous than the one in Florida. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 8:56 am
However, these laws vary greatly from state-to-state, and the dram shop law in Tennessee is more generous than the one in Florida. [read post]
5 Aug 2024, 6:30 am
The men who were acquainted with Henry and whose approval of his Life of Henry Wirt most wanted—influential patrons such as Jefferson (23-24, 30-31, 43-46, 65-66), Madison (61-64), James Monroe (65-67), and others—were instrumental in forging “the federal consensus” over slavery that dominated the American mindset during the interbellum period. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:08 pm
In the case of People v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
The purpose of a policy that restricted some patrons’ access would be to preserve the collection’s ability to serve scholars. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:58 am
Justices Thomas and Ginsburg wrote separate brief opinions concurring in the judgment (Lewis v. [read post]
