Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 4,638
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
states Justice Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
states Justice Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:32 am by Kevin Johnson
United States, in which the Supreme Court, in a 2015 opinion by Scalia, found that the Armed Career Criminal Act’s similarly worded definition of “violent felony” was so vague as to violate the due process clause. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:39 am by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, a case in which the Court invalidated a similar clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:21 am by Eugene Volokh
United States (2015), Justice Scalia held the residual clause of the Armed Career Criminal Act void for vagueness because it invited "more unpredictability and arbitrariness" than the Constitution allows. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 9:18 am by John Buhl
Fifteen briefs have been filed in support of South Dakota, including by the United States government. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At SSRN, Bryan Lammon explains why United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:31 am by Ronald Mann
Those three, along with Justices Anthony Kennedy and Neil Gorsuch, joined Thomas’ opinion rejecting the contrary ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:36 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices considered tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land, and United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves how to determine the precedential effect of Supreme Court decisions with no majority opinion, for this blog. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am by Adam Feldman
United States, Merit Management Group v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 1:46 pm by Susan C. Morse
Instead, the majority looked to the interpretation of “a similarly worded criminal statute” in a 1995 obstruction-of-justice case, United States v. [read post]