Search for: "Scott v. United States" Results 901 - 920 of 2,808
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2021, 5:48 am by Christiana Wayne
United States, a case with major implications for the future of the Computer Frauds and Abuses Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
United States by an equally divided court, with Justice Anthony Kennedy recused, for this blog. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 11:12 pm
  And, as is apparent in a recent decision by EDNY Judge Garaufis in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
The German and and Swiss Synthes entities have no presence in "the United States or the State of Texas. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:15 am by Scott Bomboy
Taney is best-known today as the author of the majority opinion in Dred Scott v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:58 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most famous example is probably Andrew Jackson's veto of the bill to renew the charter of the Bank of the United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 6:52 am by Nabiha Syed
Lyle Denniston provides a general overview of United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm by Doyle, Barlow & Mazard PLLC
  The antitrust agencies have challenged consummated deals valued as low as $3 million (see George’s/Tysons,  Complaint, United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 10:02 pm
She was named Director of the Human Trafficking Unit at the State Attorney's Office. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am by William Appleton
Department of State’s Nov. 17 filing in Cengiz et al v. bin Salman et al stating that the department recognizes Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s sovereign immunity as a sitting head of state. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm by John A. Emmons
Kristy Parker, Justin Florence, Genevieve Nadeau, Soren Dayton, and Scott Welder argued that two cases to be heard soon by the Supreme Court, Biden v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm by Dan Stein
Holder, this Term’s challenge to the Voting Rights Act of 1965, the Court held that Section 4 of the law, which identifies the state and local governments that are subject to the Act’s “preclearance” requirement, is unconstitutional based on “current conditions” in the United States. [read post]