Search for: "Shapiro v. State" Results 901 - 920 of 1,168
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ten years later, the 118th Congress includes five Indian Americans; nearly 50 are in state Legislatures. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 11:35 am
Supreme Court was the decision to permit federal preemption in the Riegel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 4:09 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Frank Garrison weigh in on last week’s decision in Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 12:52 pm by Daniel S. Swinton, Esq.
LegalZoom is trying to have the case removed from Missouri state court to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 7:23 pm
Lead Counsel: Cohen Milstein Hausfeld & Toll LLP and Spector Roseman Kodroff PC, with Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP acting as Liaison Counsel. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:11 am by Howard Wasserman
Notice Pleading Restoration Act, S. 1504, 111th Cong. (2009): “Except as otherwise expressly provided by an Act of Congress or by an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which takes effect after the date of enactment of this Act, a Federal court shall not dismiss a complaint under rule 12(b)(6) or (e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, except under the standards set forth by the Supreme Court of the United States in Conley v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
Christopher Meyer looks at the impact of last Term’s decision in Baker Botts v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 9:40 am
 David Shapiro also signed, and he served in the SG's office in the Reagan Administration. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 12:39 pm by Florian Mueller
In my previous post I published the dissenting views of Commissioner Pinkert, one of the six chiefs of the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC), from the majority decision granting Samsung (unless vetoed by the United States Trade Representative or reversed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit) an exclusion order against older iPhones and iPads. [read post]