Search for: "Shields v. United States"
Results 901 - 920
of 2,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2021, 9:50 am
” The hearing focused on the FTC’s ability to obtain equitable monetary relief under Section 13(b) of the FTC Act – an issue that is currently being considered by the Supreme Court in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:00 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 9:10 am
Doctors determined Lubinski should be transported by air ambulance to receive lifesaving treatment in the United States. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:22 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 1:08 am
On June 19, 1995 the United States Supreme Court handed down judgment in Hurley v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 6:02 am
Image via WikipediaThe United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit yesterday upheld its 2008 ruling that the Federal Communications Commission acted "arbitrarily and capriciously" when it fined CBS Corp. $550,000 for airing the 2004 Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime wardrobe malfunction that caused Justin Timberlake to bare Janet Jackson's breast for an entire nine-sixteenths of a second (see "TUOL" post 9/17/09).As reported by the Associated Press, the… [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 4:22 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 9:51 am
Its initial purpose was to combat organized crime in the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:20 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal PracticeImpersonation, Tax Evasion Sentence Upheld; 'Sharp Practice' Not Due Process Violation United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 6:51 am
2020 may very well be the most impactful year for data privacy and cybersecurity in the United States. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 5:04 pm
Wi-Fi One, LLC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass’n (NYSR&P) v. [read post]
12 Apr 2015, 4:22 am
Or, more accurately, yes, we could, but not after People v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Excepted service agencies set their own qualification requirements; they are not subject to the appointment, pay, and classification rules of Title 5, United States Code. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 10:43 am
” See SEC v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 4:30 am
Alternatively, and more sensibly, the Court may choose to revisit its previous dog sniff cases, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:50 am
At The National Law Review, Evan Seeman looks at the court’s order late last week in South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
In Matter of A.L. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
The idea was proposed to Span, which agreed on the understanding that the $300,000 would be paid back, the preferred units would be converted to common units, and Span would end up with a 10% ownership interest in Triumph. [read post]
