Search for: "Short v. Jones" Results 901 - 920 of 1,114
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 6:00 am by INFORRM
In addition to the “threshold of seriousness”, the court can be asked to decide whether there is a “real and substantial tort” and, if there is not, to strike the claim out as an abuse: Jameel v Dow Jones [2005] QB 946. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:26 am
Readability and intelligibility depend on short words in short sentences. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 7:07 am by Eleonora Rosati
Nestle v Cadbury [2022] EWHC 1671 (Ch) (July 2022)You can’t trade mark a colour. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 4:46 am by Betty Lupinacci
” The title itself comes from the case Joel v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted. [read post]
27 May 2010, 12:08 am by INFORRM
  Is “substantial harm” different from the “real and substantial tort” test set out by the Court of Appeal in Jameel v Dow Jones ([2005] QB 946) – which has been applied in a number of recent cases (see our post here)? [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
First, the short-version video: Jack Sharman – Learning in Congress from Legal Filmworks Unlimited on Vimeo. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published a number of rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 04123-19 Philips v dailyrecord.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Breach- sanction: action as offered by publication 03262-19 Bromley v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), Resolved- IPSO mediation 08073-18 A woman v Daily Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), 11 Victims of sexual assault (2018), No breach- after investigation 03816-19 Hayden… [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
If that seems as familiar as Indiana Jones 4, that very question is already before the court in a number of serial relists: Allen v. [read post]