Search for: "Smith v. Texas"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2019, 3:53 am
” Kathryn Moore has this blog’s analysis of Monday’s oral argument in Smith v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm
The question that the justices agreed to review today in Smith v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am
[Jack Goldsmith and I will have this article out in the Texas Law Review early next year, and I'm serializing it here. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:56 pm
E.g., Smith v. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Brackeen, 21-377, Texas v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
Griswold v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
" Toner v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 763 N.E.2d 160 (Ohio 2002); [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am
Making race-based jury selection decisions in violation of Batson v. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 9:27 am
Smith; and that (3) his attorney had ineffectively argued in closing that “I feel like I ought to just sit down,” because if the jury chose a death sentence, “I can’t quarrel with that” – referred to as a “Spisak error” after the Court’s opinion in Smith v. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 4:40 pm
Gonzales and Toledo-Flores v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 8:06 pm
Samsung v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 11:09 am
” When the Supreme Court returns to the bench next Monday morning to hear argument in Ayestas v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:11 am
In The Washington Post, Mark Berman reports on the aftermath of the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:31 pm
(IP Spotlight) District Court W D Texas: Plaintiff’s failure to produce invalidating documents warrants $800,000 award of attorneys’ fees and costs from date of misconduct to judgment: Atser Research Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 9:54 pm
Smith if Smith is to be overruled. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:02 pm
In 1997, in Boerne v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm
Texas, 21-6001Issues: (1) Whether, on remand, the Texas court rejected the Supreme Court’s conclusions in Andrus v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:11 am
[WSJ Law Blog, related on political-branch deference] And were the SG’s judicial-restraint principles activated by Graham v. [read post]
