Search for: "Specter v. Specter" Results 901 - 920 of 955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
As Thomas Hoey, Jr., the formerly wealthy, self-proclaimed “Banana King,” sits in his prison cell serving lengthy sentences for beating up his mistress and for what the New York Post describes as “his callous attempt to cover up a wild coke orgy in a Manhattan hotel room that ended with one woman dead of an overdose,” and as he awaits sentencing for his subsequent conviction for stealing from the employee pension fund of his bankrupt, wholesale banana company, I suppose… [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
As Thomas Hoey, Jr., the formerly wealthy, self-proclaimed “Banana King,” sits in his prison cell serving lengthy sentences for beating up his mistress and for what the New York Post describes as “his callous attempt to cover up a wild coke orgy in a Manhattan hotel room that ended with one woman dead of an overdose,” and as he awaits sentencing for his subsequent conviction for stealing from the employee pension fund of his bankrupt, wholesale banana company, I suppose… [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by Gene Quinn
On Monday, December 13, 2010, the United States Supreme Court issued a non-decision in the matter of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm by Steve Vladeck
The Supreme Court has long emphasized, as it explained in Flast v. [read post]
Stockholder Proposal Dynamics: the cumulative effects of seven years of post-Sarbanes-Oxley “precatory” stockholder proposals to dismantle all semblance of corporate takeover defenses, accompanied by the specter of “withheld” or “against” votes on director nominees if directors failed to dismantle defenses following favorable stockholder vote; and, 7. [read post]