Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 901 - 920 of 3,615
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2014, 5:28 am
In discussing Rule 23(b)(3)’s predominance requirement, the court also engaged in a lengthy analysis of the plaintiff’s damages models, stating that, pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:50 am by Alexis Domb
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 1402915 ,filed with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara.) [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 9:50 am by Alexis Domb
Iovate Health Sciences U.S.A., Inc., Case No. 1402915 ,filed with the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Barbara.) [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:24 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As reflected here, notwithstanding concurrent state court jurisdiction in the ’33 Act, the Luther v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:55 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had to decide the validity of an arbitration agreement found in a Wireless Service Agreement. [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 11:24 pm
In a recent case handed down by the California Supreme Court entitled North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 11:01 am by McGlinchey Stafford PLLC
The plaintiff filed a class action in the Superior Court of Alameda County, California asserting thirteen wage and hour claims under California state law. [read post]