Search for: "State of Minnesota v. District Court"
Results 901 - 920
of 1,678
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2012, 12:30 pm
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, similarly rejected the “no harm, no foul” rule in a non-family law case in Tavenner v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 5:13 am
In a March 4, 2015 decision in the Tile Shop Holding securities litigation (here), District of Minnesota Judge Ann D. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 7:27 am
In Swett v. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:08 am
Kishel of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Minnesota, There is no reference [in the Bankruptcy Code] to materials to be obtained from the debtor or third-party sources via formal discovery, informal exchange, or independent investigation. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 6:41 pm
Swanson (2008)The 8th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court’s ruling, striking down a part of the Minnesota Restricted Video Games Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:11 am
Wednesday, the federal district court rejected the libel claim, reasoning that the charter school was a governmental entity, and governmental entities can’t sue for libel: As a threshold matter, Plaintiff contends that as a public entity, TIZA cannot sue for defamation or related claims under New York Times Co. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
See, e.g., Minnesota v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
District Court for the District of Minnesota: In Re: SuperValu, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 2016 WL 81792 (2016) (“In re SuperValu, supra”). [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:30 am
Myers v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in the 1868 case of Texas v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:42 am
DeSender, and DLD Financial, LTDCase Number: 11-cv-03655 (United States District Court for the District of Minnesota)Case Filed: December 21, 2011Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 30, 2015 3/31/15 6/29/15 2015-32 SEC vs. [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 1:25 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal Practice Seized Account Funds Must Be Returned; Lis Pendens Against 'Substitute' Forfeitable Properties Vacated United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:23 pm
Covidien then removed the action to federal court; however, the federal district court sent the action back to state court because of UFRF’s 11th Amendment immunity. [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 1:05 pm
Where as most potential Supreme Court nominees are circumspect about their views of Roe v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 8:35 am
See Hagstrom v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
Noting that the providers in this case were free to form their own groups, oppose the SEIU, and present their complaints to the state, the appeals concluded that under the Supreme Court’s decision in Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
The case of Corporate Techs. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 8:03 am
School District Didn't Violate First Amendment for Reassigning Teacher Who Blogged--Richerson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
In the discussion of Zions First Nat’l Bank v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:18 pm
Supreme Court decision, Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
