Search for: "State v Blake"
Results 901 - 920
of 995
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2007, 1:28 am
Blake. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 4:28 am
Blake. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:54 am
In State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 8:07 am
A key case underlying the opinion is United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2007, 2:14 am
US v. [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 4:57 am
In the United States District Court, only a few judges (Chasanow, Motz, Bennett, Legg, Blake, Davis, Quarles) regularly direct that their opinions be posted. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
Proceedings of the Electoral Commission and of the Two Houses of Congress in Joint Meeting Relative to the Count of Electoral Votes Cast December 6, 1876, for the Presidential Term
Commencing March 4, 1877
1 v. (1877) United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 10:57 am
The reason links to my work seeking cert in US v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 1:03 pm
Today's challenge for readers: can anyone explain to me how Judge Posner's work for the Seventh Circuit in US v. [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 7:27 am
Gould way back in 2001, years before Blakely v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 2:23 pm
Ct. at 1381, quoting United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 pm
The latter point is especially unpersuasive: in the Sixth Amendment arena, not a single Circuit anticipated Apprendi or Blakely. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 11:42 am
(Link to Cases): For publication opinions today (4): Ronald Lee Blake, Jr. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 8:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:41 pm
The panel notes that it can't address United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 10:00 am
If this is giving you a feeling of queasy familiarity after Justice O'Connor's prescient Blakely dissent, you are not alone. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Then came Booker (argued in the Supreme Court by TChris who writes at TalkLeft) in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:23 am
United States, No. 06-5618 (cert. granted, Nov. 3, 2006); and Rita v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:12 am
Apprendi, Blakely and now Cunningham ... the A,B,C of jury trial rights now includes three cases striking down state sentencing laws giving state judges undue authority to find facts to increase sentences. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 7:04 am
"In all material respects, California's DSL resembles the sentencing systems invalidated" in Blakely v. [read post]
